Untitled Document
Michael Chertoff, the Federalist Society gremlin and current bossman
of the Ministry of Homeland Security, has it out for the Constitution. “We
have to make sure our legal system allows us” to trash the Bill of Rights,
Chertoff told the Associated
Press. “It’s not like the 20th century, where you had time to
get warrants.” In order to create the proper environment for chucking
the Constitution, the neocons are pushing hard on the latest incident of fake
terrorism, a hyped non-attack led by a pregnant woman and a pizza delivery driver.
“Chertoff made clear his belief that wider authority could thwart future
attacks at a time when Congress is reviewing the proper scope of the Bush administration’s
executive powers for its warrantless eavesdropping program and military tribunals
for detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,” the Associated Press continues.
“Congress is now reviewing some of the programs after lawmakers questioned
the legality of the warrantless eavesdropping program and the Supreme Court
ruled in June that the tribunals defied international law and had not been authorized
by Congress.”
However, Chertoff and his buddies at the Richard Mellon Scaife funded
Federalist Society will make darn sure the Constitution does not get in the
way of the war against Muslims. In order to get a proper perspective on the
Federalist Society and Chertoff’s thinking, consider who is associated
with this club of reactionary fascists—Edwin Meese, Irving Kristol, Antonin
Scalia, John Bolton, John Negroponte, and Fox News wunderkind William Kristol.
As usual, the latest non-terrorist event is being exploited to further erode
our constitutional liberties. “Following the foiled United Kingdom bomb
plot, the Bush administration is expected to use the terrorist threat to regain
the upper hand in congressional debates and push for government action before
the November elections,” reports the War
Street Journal. “Republicans appear to be circling around a new strategy
to advocate stronger counterterrorism laws and expand domestic surveillance,
while pushing back against civil libertarians.”
Note how, as usual, “civil libertarians” endanger us all in their
zeal to appease and enable terrorists, never mind that said terrorists are more
often than not government patsies or clueless unfortunates caught in the wrong
place at the wrong time.
“Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is emerging as a point
man in the drive for tougher laws, yesterday noting Britain’s ability
to hold suspects without publicizing the charges. Appearing on ABC News’s
‘This Week with George Stephanopoulos,’ Mr. Chertoff said he would
like to see a renewed look at U.S. laws that could give authorities here the
flexibility to detain suspects for longer periods of time, noting that the British
have such latitude.”
Of course, the British don’t have a Bill of Rights and if Chertoff and
the neocons have their way, we won’t have one here either. The “flexibility
to detain suspects for longer periods of time” translates into indefinite
detention minus formal charges, in other words the concept of habeas corpus
will be thrown out the window if these guys get their way. It is sincerely ironic
that the concept of habeas corpus is rooted in English Common Law (i.e., the
“Great Writ”), not that you would recognize any such tradition in
Britain now. In America, since the founding, the concept of habeas corpus has
endured attack on numerous occasions, most notably Lincoln’s suspension
of the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War and the same by FDR during
the Second World War, resulting in the concentration camp internment of thousands
of Japanese Americans.
In the coming days, we will be expected to endure the sincerely absurd pretext
of “liquid bombs” as an excuse to further erode our civil liberties.
Such freak show nonsense beamed into American living rooms 24-7 by the corporate
media makes fertile soil (as in manure applied liberally) for tyranny window
dressed as a compassionate government attempting to save us from terrorists
wielding sports drink bombs. “Recent polls show while Americans are concerned
that the U.S. government will go too far in monitoring the activities of potential
terrorists in the U.S. and violate the privacy of average citizens, they also
are supportive of legislation such as the Patriot Act, and on balance have been
inclined to embrace controversial antiterror steps, such as telephone and financial
surveillance, over civil-liberties concerns. Republican congressional leaders
have already begun to raise the possibility that changes might be needed.”
Call it a shell game. Yet another outrageous “foiled terrorist act,”
completely over the top and indeed comical, if not for its serious ramifications,
points the American people down the primrose path to dictatorship, accepting
the draconian Patriot Act “on balance,” while embracing “controversial
antiterror steps” (for instance, turning airports—and soon enough,
other travel venues—into Gestapo zones), all for their own good, of course.
Pat Roberts, chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and backroom
fixer who made sure to cover up the stinking pile of neocon lies and fabrications
in the lead up to the invasion of Iraq, expressed his utter contempt for our
constitutional system: “Roberts … told CBS’s ‘Face the
Nation’ that he believes the British have better intelligence tools than
Americans. ‘If you want to get a warrant, all you have to do is call up
a minister, in regards to Great Britain,’ he said. Sen. Roberts stopped
short of advocating similar changes, but added ‘it seems to me that they
have taken actions that would really speed that along.’” Adopting
these “intelligence tools” (akin to the “tools” used
by the Nazis and other fascists down through the years) would take a big chunk
out of the Constitution, viz. the Fourth Amendment and the requirement that
a court warrant be issued on probable cause.
“Similar sentiment has been expressed by senior Republicans in the House
as well. ‘You can’t be going to court every time you want to monitor
these conversations because they come in at a rapid pace. And… we have
to get away from this concept that we have to apply civil-liberties protections
to terrorists,” Peter King (R., N.Y.), the chairman of the House Homeland
Security Committee, said last week on Fox News’s ‘The O’Reilly
Factor,’” a near perfect venue for the fascist King who hates the
Constitution, as it is used to appease “terrorists,” never mind
a predominant number of these so-called “terrorists” are in fact
government patsies.
__________________________
Read from Looking Glass News
Liquid
Bomb Pakistan Link Is False Flag Smoking Gun
The
Anglo-American empire’s "next 9/11" will set up final war; "foiled"
UK terror plot a propaganda dry run
The
Pentagon's "Second 911"
PATSIES
LIQUID
TERROR: Training People To Act Like Subservient Slaves
Dirty
Neo-Fascist Slugs Slam-Dunk Another Terror Scam
Let’s
thwart "the Big One" now
MI-5
in ludicrous Heathrow terror stunt