Sipping on a bottle of water and holding a book about the history and
future of Islam, Kevin Barrett ticked off a few examples of what he saw as evidence
that the Sept. 11 attacks had been an “inside job.”
As children zoomed by on tricycles and shot basketballs at a community
center near his home, Mr. Barrett, 47, described how some news orgainzations
(the French daily newspaper Figaro and Radio France International, in fact)
had reported that an agent from the Central Intelligence Agency visited with
Osama bin Laden two months before the attacks. He also said fires could not
have caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers at free-fall speed,
as reported by the special Sept. 11 commission. “The 9/11 report will
be universally reviled as a sham and a cover-up very soon,” said Mr. Barrett,
who has been a teacher’s assistant or lecturer on Islam, African literature
and other subjects at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, since 1996. “The
9/11 commission has its conspiracy theory, and we have ours.”
Mr. Barrett’s views, which he described on a conservative radio talk
show in June, have outraged some Wisconsin legislators and generated a fierce
debate about academic freedom on a campus long known as a haven for progressive
ideologies and student activism.
“They apparently have no limits to what can be taught in the classroom,”
Representative Steve Nass said of the university’s decision to allow Mr.
Barrett to teach a class this fall titled “Islam: Religion and Culture.”
“Barrett has got to go,’’ Mr. Nass, a Whitewater Republican,
said. “It is an embarrassment for the state of Wisconsin. It is an embarrassment
for the university.”
The week of July 24, Mr. Nass, who is up for re-election this year, sent a
resolution signed by 61 state legislators — all but one of them Republican
— to Gov. James E. Doyle, a Democrat, and university officials condemning
Mr. Barrett’s “academically dishonest views” and demanding
that his one-semester contract to teach the class for a salary of $8,247 be
Mr. Barrett, a co-founder of a group called Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance
for 9/11 Truth, argued that he had never presented his personal opinions in
class and that he was free to offer those opinions on his own time outside the
“Why is liberal Wisconsin going bananas over an $8,000-a-year lecturer
who’s not even teaching his own views in the course?” Mr. Barrett
asked. “I go out of my way to bring in diverse interpretations for students
to look at.”
The university’s chancellor, John D. Wiley, said that he was baffled
by Mr. Barrett’s beliefs but that they were irrelevant in the classroom,
where he must stick to a syllabus that has been approved by the department.
That syllabus includes a week devoted to the war on terror.
A 10-day university review had determined that Mr. Barrett presented a variety
of viewpoints and that he had not discussed his personal opinions in the classroom,
Mr. Wiley said.
“I think it would be a serious mistake for legislators to try to get
in and micromanage curriculum,” said Mr. Wiley, who added that university
officials would keep an eye on Mr. Barrett by meeting with him throughout the
semester. “We don’t go around and question all our instructors to
find out what all their views are.”
At the University of Colorado, a committee voted in June to fire Ward L. Churchill,
an ethnic studies professor who had compared some victims of the Sept. 11 attacks
to a Nazi official. Professor Churchill appealed this month to keep his job.
And early this year at Northwestern University, Arthur R. Butz, a tenured professor
of engineering, drew strong criticism after saying he agreed with the belief
of the president of Iran that the Holocaust was a myth.
Patrick V. Farrell, the provost of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, said
the university was not focusing on Mr. Barrett’s political views but on
the teaching and learning experience in the classroom.
“I want to avoid as much as we can creating some kind of a political
test for instructors or faculty, to say that only those whose thinking fits
within some predetermined mold are well equipped to teach our students,”
Mr. Farrell said. “I think that creates a dangerous precedent.”
Some Wisconsin students said they thought it was a crucial part of a college
education to learn about a variety of theories, including radical ones, before
forming opinions on a topic.
“It’s a student’s decision in a class whether they believe
what a professor is saying,” said Jillian Alpire, 22, who graduated this
year. “Just because he said his opinions on a radio station does not mean
that’s what the course is going to be about.”
Ben Kopish, 20, a junior, said that such a controversial discourse should be
welcomed at a public university that is known for fostering outspoken academic
“If it doesn’t happen somewhere like the Madison campus,”
Mr. Kopish said, “then I don’t know where else it would happen.”
But Katherine Brown, 20, who had finished a summer course on Islam, questioned
the role of such a political discussion in a religion class.
“I just feel like it isn’t relevant because Islam is a religion,”
said Ms. Brown, who added that she agreed with her own professor’s decision
not to discuss the war on terror. “It’s not about what’s going
on currently in politics so much.”
Mr. Barrett’s ideas place him squarely within a loose confederation of
skeptics who think the American government had a role in the Sept. 11 attacks
and whose theories are spread through the Internet and other means.
Mr. Barrett and Chancellor Wiley both said the controversy might actually be
helping provide Mr. Barrett with a larger platform to voice his ideas. It has
sparked curiosity in students like Ms. Brown, who said she was interested in
finding out more about why Mr. Barrett believes what he does.
Although Ms. Brown said she did not believe that the government could have
been involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, she added, “So many very important
things that we know now were considered radical when they were first presented
Read from Looking Glass News
for 9/11 Truth under Attack
Iran-Contra Criminal Grills Jim Fetzer
Teacher Persecuted for 9/11 Heresy
Ward Churchill, 9/11 Official Version Guardian
Receives Customary Death Threats
Brother’s Youth League Snoops Colorado Teacher
"There are 50,000 professors ... [who] identify with the terrorists"
Academics: Right-wing Distortions About Leftist Professors
Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
9/11 Commission's Incredible Tales
Commission report is a lie
Commission continues cover-up, circles wagons for stumbling empire
Commission - Forgedda Boudit
Destruction of the World Trade Center
Half-Dozen Questions About 9/11 They Don't Want You to Ask
reasons to question the official story of 9/11
: ON THE EVE OF DESTRUCTION
Reasons to Question the Official 9/11 Story
Evidence that Official 9/11 Story is a Lie
Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?
"Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!"
Larry Silverstein can’t get it up
Rice/Zelikow Connection: The Kean Commission and its Conflicts of Interest
Fireman Lou Cacchioli Upset That 9/11 Commission 'Tried To Twist My Words;'
A True Hero, He Vows To Stick To The Truth, Something Lacking In The 9/11 Investigation