Dispatch from Mexico City
Gore v. Bush.
Kerry v Bush.
Lopez Obrador v Calderon.
As in Florida in 2000, as in Ohio in 2004, the exit polls show the voters voted
for the progressive candidate, but the race is “officially” too
close to call.
But they will call it — after they steal it. Reuters News agency reports
that, as of 8pm Eastern time, as voting concluded in Mexico, exit polls show
Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the “left-wing” Party of the Democratic
Revolution (PRD) leading in exit polls over Felipe Calderon of the ruling conservative
National Action Party (PAN).
We’ve said again and again: Exit polls tell us how voters say they voted,
but the voters can’t tell pollsters if their vote will be counted. In
Mexico, counting the vote is an art, not a science — and Calderon’s
ruling crew is very artful indeed. The PAN-controlled official electoral commission,
not surprisingly, has announced that the presidential tally is too close to
Calderon’s election is openly supported by the Bush Administration.
On the ground in Mexico City, our news team reports accusations from inside
the Obrador campaign that operatives of the PAN had access to voter files which
are supposed to be the sole property of the nation’s electoral commission.
We are not surprised.
This past Friday, we reported that the US Federal Bureau of Investigation had
obtained Mexico’s voter files under a secret “counterterrorism”
contract with database company ChoicePoint of Alpharetta, Georgia. (See BUSH
TEAM HELPS RULING PARTY “FLORIDIZE” MEXICAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.)
The FBI’s contractor states that, following the arrest of ChoicePoint
agents by the Mexican government, the company returned or destroyed its files. The firm claims not
to have known collecting this information violated Mexican law. Such files can
be useful in challenging a voter’s right to cast a ballot or in preventing
that vote from counting.
It is, of course, impossible to know if the FBI destroyed its own copy of the
files of Mexico’s voter rolls obtained by Choicepoint or if these were
then used to illegally assist the Calderon candidacy.
But we can see the results: as in the US, first in Florida then in Ohio, the
exit polls are at odds with “official” polls.
In November 2004, US Republican Senator Richard Lugar, in Kiev, cited the divergence
of exit polls and official polls as solid evidence of “blatant fraud”
in the vote count in Ukraine. As a result, the Bush Administration refused to
recognize the Ukraine government’s official
vote tally … which proves once again that Republicans are incapable of
The foreign mainstream press has already announced, despite the polling discrepancies,
that Mexico’s elections were fair and clean — which would be a first
for that country where Lopez Obrador’s party has seen its candidates defeated
by “blatant fraud” before. The change this time is that the fraud
is simply less blatant.
Read from Looking Glass News
struggles intensify on eve of Mexican elections
the worst of them all