Arthur Miller wrote, "Few of us can easily surrender our belief
that society must somehow make sense. The thought that the state has lost its
mind and is punishing so many innocent people is intolerable. And so the evidence
has to be internally denied."
Miller's truth was a glimpsed reality on television on June 9 when
Israeli warships fired on families picnicking on a Gaza beach, killing seven
people, including three children and three generations. What that represents
is a final solution, agreed by the United States and Israel, to the problem
of the Palestinians. While the Israelis fire missiles at Palestinian picnickers
and homes in Gaza and the West Bank, the two governments are to starve them.
The victims will be mostly children.
This was approved on May 23 by the U.S. House of Representatives, which voted
361-37 to cut off aid to non-government organizations that run a lifeline to
occupied Palestine. Israel is withholding Palestinian revenues and tax receipts
amounting to $60 million a month. Such collective punishment, identified as
a crime against humanity in the Geneva Conventions, evokes the Nazis' strangulation
of the Warsaw ghetto and the American economic siege of Iraq in the 1990s. If
the perpetrators have lost their minds, as Miller suggested, they appear to
understand their barbarism and display their cynicism. "The idea is to
put the Palestinians on a diet," joked Dov Weisglass, an adviser to the
Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert.
This is the price Palestinians must pay for their democratic elections in January.
The majority voted for the "wrong" party, Hamas, which the U.S. and
Israel, with their inimitable penchant for pot-calling-the-kettle-black, describe
as terrorist. However, terrorism is not the reason for starving the Palestinians,
whose prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, had reaffirmed Hamas's commitment to recognize
the Jewish state, proposing only that Israel obey international law and respect
the borders of 1967. Israel has refused because, with its apartheid wall under
construction, its intention is clear: to take over more and more of Palestine,
encircling whole villages and eventually Jerusalem.
The reason Israel fears Hamas is that Hamas is unlikely to be a trusted collaborator
in subjugating its own people on Israel's behalf. Indeed, the vote for Hamas
was actually a vote for peace. Palestinians were fed up with the failures and
corruption of the Arafat era. According to the former U.S. president Jimmy Carter,
whose Carter Center verified the Hamas electoral victory, "public opinion
polls show that 80 percent of Palestinians want a peace agreement with Israel."
How ironic this is, considering that the rise of Hamas was due in no small
part to the secret support it received from Israel, which, with the U.S. and
Britain, wanted Islamists to undermine secular Arabism and its "moderate"
dreams of freedom. Hamas refused to play this Machiavellian game and in the
face of Israeli assaults maintained a cease-fire for 18 months. The objective
of the Israeli attack on the beach at Gaza was clearly to sabotage the cease-fire.
This is a time-honored tactic.
Now, state terror in the form of a medieval siege is to be applied to the most
vulnerable. For the Palestinians, a war against their children is hardly new.
A 2004 field study published in the British Medical Journal reported that, in
the previous four years, "Two-thirds of the 621 children … killed
[by the Israelis] at checkpoints … on the way to school, in their homes,
died from small arms fire, directed in over half the cases to the head, neck,
and chest – the sniper's wound." A quarter of Palestinian infants
under the age of five are acutely or chronically malnourished. The Israeli wall
"will isolate 97 primary health clinics and 11 hospitals from the populations
The study described "a man in a now fenced-in village near Qalqilya [who]
approached the gate with his seriously ill daughter in his arms and begged the
soldiers on duty to let him pass so that he could take her to hospital. The
Gaza, now sealed like an open prison and terrorized by the sonic boom of Israeli
fighter aircraft, has a population of which almost half is under 15. Dr. Khalid
Dahlan, a psychiatrist who heads a children's community health project, told
me, "The statistic I personally find unbearable is that 99.4 percent of
the children we studied suffer trauma … 99.2 percent had their homes bombarded;
97.5 percent were exposed to tear gas; 96.6 percent witnessed shooting; a third
saw family members or neighbors injured or killed."
These children suffer unrelenting nightmares and "night terrors"
and the dichotomy of having to cope with these conditions. On the one hand,
they dream about becoming doctors and nurses "so they can help others";
on the other, this is then overtaken by an apocalyptic vision of themselves
as the next generation of suicide bombers. They experience this invariably after
attacks by the Israelis. For some boys, their heroes are no longer football
players, but a confusion of Palestinian "martyrs" and even the enemy,
"because Israeli soldiers are the strongest and have Apache gunships."
That these children are now to be punished further may be beyond human comprehension,
but there is a logic. Over the years, the Palestinians have avoided falling
into the abyss of an all-out civil war, knowing this is what the Israelis want.
Destroying their elected government while attempting to build a parallel administration
around the collusive Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, may well produce,
as the Oxford academic Karma Nabulsi wrote, "a Hobbesian vision of an anarchic
society … ruled by disparate militias, gangs, religious ideologues and
broken into ethnic and religious tribalism, and co-opted collaborationists.
Look to the Iraq of today: that is what [Ariel Sharon] had in store for us."
The struggle in Palestine is an American war, waged from America's most heavily
armed foreign military base, Israel. In the West, we are conditioned not to
think of the Israeli-Palestinian "conflict" in those terms, just as
we are conditioned to think of the Israelis as victims, not illegal and brutal
occupiers. This is not to underestimate the ruthless initiatives of the Israeli
state, but without F-16s and Apaches and billions of American taxpayers' dollars,
Israel would have made peace with the Palestinians long ago. Since the Second
World War, the U.S. has given Israel some $140 billion, much of it as armaments.
According to the Congressional Research Service, the same "aid" budget
was to include $28 million "to help [Palestinian] children deal with the
current conflict situation" and to provide "basic first aid."
That has now been vetoed.
Karma Nabulsi's comparison with Iraq is apposite, for the same "policy"
applies there. The capture of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was a wonderful media event:
what the philosopher Hannah Arendt called "action as propaganda,"
and having little bearing on reality. The Americans and those who act as their
bullhorn have their demon – even a video game of his house being blown
up. The truth is that Zarqawi was largely their creation. His apparent killing
serves an important propaganda purpose, distracting us in the west from the
American goal of converting Iraq, like Palestine, into a powerless society of
ethnic and religious tribalism. Death squads, formed and trained by veterans
of the CIA's "counterinsurgency" in central America, are critical
to this. The Special Police Commandos, a CIA creation led by former senior intelligence
officers in Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath Party, are perhaps the most brutal. The
Zarqawi killing and the myths about his importance also deflect from routine
massacres by U.S. soldiers, such as the one at Haditha. Even the puppet Prime
Minister Nouri al-Maliki complains that murderous behavior of U.S. troops is
"a daily occurrence." As I learned in Vietnam, a form of serial killing,
then known officially as "body count," is the way the Americans fight
their colonial wars.
This is known as "pacification." The asymmetry of a pacified Iraq
and a pacified Palestine is clear. As in Palestine, the war in Iraq is against
civilians, mostly children. According to UNICEF, Iraq once had one of the highest
indicators for the well-being of children. Today, a quarter of children between
the ages of six months and five years suffer acute or chronic malnutrition,
worse than during the years of sanctions. Poverty and disease have risen with
each day of the occupation.
In April, in British-occupied Basra, the European aid agency Saving Children
from War reported: "The mortality of young children had increased by 30
percent compared with the Saddam Hussein era." They die because the hospitals
have no ventilators and the water supply, which the British were meant to have
fixed, is more polluted than ever. Children fall victim to unexploded U.S. and
British cluster bombs. They play in areas contaminated by depleted uranium;
by contrast, British army survey teams venture there only in full-body radiation
suits, face masks, and gloves. Unlike the children they came to "liberate,"
British troops are given what the Ministry of Defense calls "full biological
Was Arthur Miller right? Do we "internally deny" all this, or do
we listen to distant voices? On my last trip to Palestine, I was rewarded, on
leaving Gaza, with a spectacle of Palestinian flags fluttering from inside the
walled compounds. Children are responsible for this. No one tells them to do
it. They make flagpoles out of sticks tied together, and one or two climb on
to a wall and hold the flag between them, silently. They do it, believing they
will tell the world.
"Anything...even if it’s a three-year-old,
needs to be killed. Over."
Israel Spinning Out of Control Sam Bahour, The Electronic Intifada,
13 June 2006
Israel’s Defense Minister Amir Peretz announced today that Israel is preparing
a global "propaganda offensive" to counter the recent barrage of news
reports and writings that condemned Israel for the recent killing of 10 civilians,
including 5 children, on a Gaza beach. In political and media lingo this is
called spin, to twist and turn an event so as to give an intended interpretation,
and Israel excels at it.
Israel is unable to comprehend that by going to extremes to find a single event
that lends itself well for a “propaganda offensive,” its continued
military occupation, now extrajudicially killing an average of 10 Palestinians
per day, is causing so much death and destruction that its spin not only instigates
further animosity against Israel, but fuels a culture of propaganda and arbitrary
aggression in Israel that is ripping apart Israeli society at its fragile seams.
Before looking at the specific Gaza beach killings, let’s remember Israel’s
track record of conducting investigations. Not to bore you, I will not delve
into the entire period of 58 years of dispossession of Palestinians caused by
Israel’s creation, nor will I touch on the full 39 years of Israel’s
ongoing military occupation of over 3.5 million Palestinians. It is enough to
look only at the last few years of Israeli aggression to make the point that
Israel is attempting to cover blatant war crimes by media spin. Worse yet, the
international community is allowing them to get away with it.
These last few years have been characterized by the intensity of mostly the
same practices Israel has used for decades. The context of these Israeli actions
toward Palestinians may be summarized as follows: collective punishment, travel
restrictions, denial of access to religious sites (e.g. Jerusalem, Bethlehem),
bombarding population centers, arbitrary imprisonment (20% of population has
been imprisoned at some time in their lives since 1967, which equates to 60
million people if compared in U.S. terms), demolishing houses (since 1967 Israel
has demolished almost 12,000 Palestinian homes, leaving some 70,000 without
shelter and traumatized), deporting Palestinians, uprooting trees, strangulating
the Palestinian economy, taking Palestinians’ natural resources hostage
(e.g. water, electromagnetic spectrum) - the list is endless.
A case in point
As reported in The Guardian (UK) by Chris McGreal, of how Israel deals with
investigating Palestinian deaths:
An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl
in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying
he would have killed her even if she was three years old. The officer, identified
by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his
weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions
after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun’s magazine into when she walked
into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident,
played on Israeli television, contradicts the army’s account of the events
and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
Iman al-Hamas The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked
towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying
But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene
reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point
was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at
least 100 yards from any soldier.
Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl
of about 10" who was "scared to death".
The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away
from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.
At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit
of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying
his magazine into her body.
The tape recording is of a three-way conversation between the army watchtower,
the army post’s operations room and the captain, who was a company commander.
The soldier in the watchtower radioed his colleagues after he saw Iman:
"It’s a little girl. She’s running defensively eastward."
Operations room: "Are we talking about a girl under the age of
Watchtower: "A girl of about 10, she’s behind the embankment,
scared to death."
A few minutes later, Iman is shot in the leg from one of the army posts.
The watchtower: "I think that one of the positions took her out."
The company commander then moves in as Iman lies wounded and helpless.
Captain R: "I and another soldier ... are going in a little nearer,
forward, to confirm the kill ... Receive a situation report. We fired and killed
her ... I also confirmed the kill. Over."
Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked
away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah’s
hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.
On the tape, the company commander then "clarifies" why he
killed Iman: "This is commander. Anything that’s mobile, that moves
in the zone, even if it’s a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over."
The army’s original account of the killing said that the soldiers only
identified Iman as a child after she was first shot. But the tape shows that
they were aware just how young the small, slight girl was before any shots were
The case came to light after soldiers under the command of Captain R went to
an Israeli newspaper to accuse the army of covering up the circumstances of
A subsequent investigation by the officer responsible for the Gaza strip, Major
General Dan Harel, concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically".
— Chris McGreal, The Guardian (UK), Nov. 24, 2004) If you are curious,
a five-count indictment was ultimately brought against Captain R. A few months
ago Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reported that Captain “R,”
a Givati Brigade soldier in the IDF, would be awarded 80,000 NIS [over $15,000
USD] in compensation from the State of Israel in addition to reimbursement for
NIS 2,000 of legal expenses, as part of an arrangement reached between his lawyers
and the military prosecution after being acquitted of all five counts against
him related to the killing of Iman!
A second case in point
On the night of July 22, 2002 an Israeli F-16 dropped a one-ton bomb in a densely
populated area of Gaza City, killing Hamas military wing leader Salah Shehadeh
and 16 others, of whom 15 were civilians and 9 were children (between the ages
of two months and 13 years), including Shehadeh’s wife and child. Over
one hundred others were injured in the attack.
Witnesses said that a F-16 fired a missile into an apartment house in which
Shehadeh and his family were living. The air strike shortly after midnight leveled
the five-storey apartment block and damaged several adjacent buildings.
In a Ha’aretz interview, the then Israeli Air Force Commander Maj. Gen.
Dan Halutz claimed to be satisfied both "militarily and morally" with
the operation. He was subsequently promoted to his current position of IDF Chief
A third case in point
The Jenin Refugee Camp, the second largest refugee camp in the West Bank, was
surrounded by Israeli occupation forces as part of their aggression throughout
the West Bank and continuing till today. The camp was raided and tens of Palestinians
were murdered and dozens of homes bulldozed. For days, the Israelis refused
to allow medical personnel, journalists, Red Cross, and the UN enter the camp.
An Israeli military bulldozer driver, Moshe Nissim, left little to the imagination
as he described his actions in the camp while it was besieged. “They were
warned by loudspeaker to get out of the house before I come, but I gave no one
a chance. I didn’t wait. I didn’t give one blow, and wait for them
to come out. I would just ram the house with full power, to bring it down as
fast as possible. I wanted to get to the other houses. To get as many as possible,
I didn’t give a damn about the Palestinians, but I didn’t just ruin
with no reason. It was all under orders.”
On orders, the razing continued long after the battle was over. Dated aerial
photos obtained from the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs corroborate his
tale, leading military expert and Amnesty International delegate Major David
Holley to conclude: “There were events post-11 April that were neither
militarily justifiable nor had any military necessity: the IDF leveled the final
battlefield completely after the cessation of hostilities. It is surmised that
the complete destruction of the ruins of battle, therefore, is punishment for
Nissim concurs. “I found joy with every house that came down, because
I knew they didn’t mind dying, but they cared for their homes. If you
knocked down a house, you buried 40 or 50 people for generations. If I am sorry
for anything, it is for not tearing the whole camp down,” he says. “They
will sit quietly. Jenin will not return to what it used to be.”
— Peter Lagerquist, The Daily Star, November 22nd, 2003)
Palestinians demanded an investigation.
A fact finding mission was proposed by the United Nations on April 19, 2002.
Israel initially agreed to co-operate with the inquiry, but demanded a set of
conditions to do so. Among the conditions, Israel demanded that the mission
should include anti-terrorism experts, that the UN agree not to prosecute Israeli
soldiers for potential violations of international law, and that it limit its
scope exclusively to events in Jenin. The UN refused to accept the last two
conditions and were forced to ultimately disband their mission.
The world will never know, until a war crimes trail in The Hague of Israeli
officials, what really happened inside the camp during those deadly days.
The cases demonstrating Israel’s systematic cover-up of Palestinian deaths
are voluminous. It will suffice to direct you to Leigh Brady’s writing
on this issue, entitled, "Don’t worry - it’s just another Palestinian
child’s death" (Live from Palestine, 31 March 2006)
Not all Israelis are blind to Israel’s war crimes. The renowned Israeli
journalist Amira Hass who lives in Ramallah wrote these words: “There
is a long list of Palestinian civilians whose blood was spilled neither in battle
nor because they endangered someone, and their blood has evaporated from our
consciousness.” (Ha’aretz, 9 February 2005.)
So back to the Gaza beach killings. Israel is now claiming, five days after
the fact, that they are not responsible for the killing. Instead, the spin that
they have developed is that the deaths were a result of a mine planted in the
sand by Palestinians in anticipation of Israeli navy seals attacking Gaza from
the sea. Is this possible? Yes? Will we ever really know? No? Well, again, not
until Israeli officials are brought before The Hague for their war crimes.
In the hours and days to come, Israel will have an army of media experts speaking
perfect mother-tongue language of their target audience explaining, in what
seems scientific terms, why their “findings” exonerate the Israeli
military from these killings. What they miss is that responsible accountability
requires not the occupier to investigate the occupier, or Israeli military to
investigate the Israeli military.
What is required is an international and independent investigation, an investigation
that has consequences. Is this too much to ask for? Well, if we look at past
Israeli investigations of their own leaders we can use the past Israeli Prime
Minister, Ariel Sharon, to learn how Israelis punish their own leaders.
The date was September 16-18, 1982. The place was the Palestinian refugee camps
of Sabra and Shatila in Beirut. Then Israeli Defense Minister Ariel Sharon encircled
the camps, sealed them, and sent in his closest allies amongst the Lebanese
militias to "cleanse" the area of the "2,000 terrorists"
which he insisted had remained there during Israelis invasion of Southern Lebanon.
As a result, hundreds of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians were subject to
three days of relentless torture, rape and killing, while hundreds more were
arrested and trucked away, never to be seen again: an estimated 2000 civilians
were killed or disappeared.
Ariel Sharon What happen to Sharon? A high-level Israeli commission was formed
to investigate. The result of that investigation was the “Report of the
Commission of Inquiry into the Events at the Refugee Camps in Beirut”
(The Kahan Commission, February 8, 1983). The report stated:
“We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister
of Defense bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that
the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out
of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the
duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether
he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the
Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing
the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."”
After being found unfit to be Defense Minister, Ariel Sharon swiftly rose to
be the Prime Minister of Israel, twice.
Of course Palestinians are firing missiles into Israel, albeit a failing strategy.
If some Palestinians had the chance to smuggle F-16s into Gaza to release them
toward Tel Aviv, I’m sure they would. I wonder what the State of Texas
would do if Mexico militarily occupied if for 39 years. I would assume, then,
the Palestinian missiles excuse would be acknowledged for what it is, acts of
desperation and not an existential threat.
In spinning the recent Gaza beach killings, Israel will no doubt point to the
homemade missiles that a few Palestinians are firing into Israel as a pretext
to the continuous Israeli shelling of Gaza. But again, Israel forgets that after
occupying Palestinians by force in a most brutal way for so long and giving
no indication of the possibility for peaceful co-existence built on international
law and human rights, they are feeding a terrible, lethal despair within Palestine
that gives rise to steps of desperation taken by a few desperate people to cause
harm to the occupier.
Not only is the Palestinian firing of missiles into Israel a failing strategy,
one I wish I had the power to stop, but it is a blatant example of Palestinians
not having a strategy that can end the occupation. Not having a strategy of
liberation is understood, albeit unacceptable.
Israel has killed off and imprisoned most of the first and second level Palestinian
leadership. Also, two-thirds of the Palestinian population is denied entry into
Palestine and thus cannot participate on the ground to create a better reality.
Thus, without a cohesive leadership, who could expect those under Israel’s
non-stop aggression to become peace doves overnight.
Palestinian medics examine a child wounded in an Israeli air strike at a car
carrying militants in the northern Gaza June 13, 2006. A total of ten people,
including two children and two militants, were killed in the air strike. (MaanImages/Thaeer
al-Hassany) Jews are very familiar with Yiddish, the Jewish dialect that gave
us the widely used term, chutzpah. The dictionary defines chutzpah as unbelievable
gall; insolence; audacity. In Palestinian lay terms, chutzpah relates to Israel’s
amazing ability to kill a people in cold blood and then march solemnly in their
Israelis must wake up. International and humanitarian laws do not release the
State of Israel, or individual soldiers, from their responsibility as an occupying
force simply because they apologize for killing those they occupy.
While Israel launched its “propaganda offensive” today, another
11 Palestinians were killed, 2 of them children and 2 medics, when Israeli warplanes
struck a Palestinian car on a crowded Gaza City street. Also, in the midst of
this living hell, Israeli Defense Minister stated that the time for restraint
If the Israeli-made living hell that we have been living with thus far was
an example of Israel showing restraint, God help us all, Palestinians and Israelis,
as the Israeli occupation flexes its military muscle in the coming days. When
all the flexing is done and all the dead buried, the occupation will still be
wrong and The Hague will still await all those who committed war crimes.
Sam Bahour is a Palestinian-American living in the besieged
Palestinian City of El-Bireh in the West Bank. He is co-author of HOMELAND:
Oral Histories of Palestine and Palestinians (1994) and can be reached at email@example.com.
By : Cyril Borge
Read from Looking Glass News
Israelis continue to slaughter children unabated
Israel: Rogue Nation Committing Genocide
Israelis bomb crowded Gaza beach, kill children
Israeli settlers stab to death Palestinian child
Israel Punishes Palestinians for Existing