Untitled Document
Taking a Closer Look at the Stories Ignored by the Corporate Media
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact

NEWS
All News
9-11
Corporatism
Disaster in New Orleans
Economics
Environment
Globalization
Government / The Elite
Human Rights
International Affairs
Iraq War
London Bombing
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism
Miscellaneous

COMMENTARY
All Commentaries
9-11
CIA
Corporatism
Economics
Government / The Elite
Imperialism
Iraq War
Media
Police State / Military
Science / Health
Voting Integrity
War on Terrorism

SEARCH/ARCHIVES
Advanced Search
View the Archives

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly

WAR ON TERRORISM -
-

The Great Escape

Posted in the database on Sunday, June 11th, 2006 @ 16:55:55 MST (2166 views)
by lenin    Lenin's Tomb  

Untitled Document

Three men have killed themselves in the off-shore gulag that the American government allows itself to have. The reason? Rear Adm. Harry Harris Jr says:

"They are smart, they are creative, they are committed ... They have no regard for life, neither ours nor their own. I believe this was not an act of desperation, but an act of asymmetrical warfare waged against us."

'They' are prisoners held without charge, trial or opportunity for reprieve in an island torture-chamber. Yet, since 'they' have already been determined guilty, and given the series of imaginative associations immediately available upon remembering that the prisoners are Muslims, it must seem somehow okay to engage in this bizarre Orwellian reversal. What would one think if any other government offered this kind of ridiculous claim in a similar situation? Those whom 'we' have locked up in a repressive prison camp with no chance of justice are the aggressors - they make war against 'us'.

Bush has responded to criticisms by saying he'd like to close down his little torture playpen, but he's awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court - as if an administration that has appointed and promoted convicted felons and broken the law repeatedly is concerned with what the law says. Bush signed the Executive Order that allowed Rumsfeld to set these institutions up. Bush issued the directive designating alleged Al Qaeda or Taliban suspects as 'unlawful combatants' not 'prisoners of war', thus exempting the administration by diktat from national and international laws. It was the Bush administration that arrogated to itself 'war powers' that went beyond judicial review and meant it could detain prisoners indefinitely and without access to counsel or courts. And it was the administration that ignored the Supreme Court when it directed that Guantanamo inmates can challenge their captivity in federal courts, instead allowing the military to set up Combatant Status Review Tribunals from which lawyers were banned. These would charge the prisoners under rules written by the Defense Department. They have since faced repeated legal rulings to stop spying on those lawyers who do get to talk to inmates and to end the non-judicial Tribunals and allow for proper habeus corpus proceedings in federal courts. Eventually, detainees were allowed to write one-page letters to court via translators, which means they are considered to be representing themselves without attorney. Now, since the Republican senate in alliance with Democrat co-sponsor Carl Levin has already approved a motion stripping Guantanamo inmates of their right to file habeus corpus appeals, what the Supreme Court is looking at is whether it's okay to go ahead with a non-judicial Tribunal for Salim Hamdan, alleged to have been bin Laden's driver and accused of 'war crimes', or whether in fact this violates the US constitution and international law.

Any decision that doesn't go the administration's way will presumably be ignored, as it was the first time when the Supreme Court specifically ruled that there must be access to federal courts, not military tribunals. Since Bush believes his war powers extend beyond judicial review, he will say that no decision by the Supreme Court that interferes with his executive decision-making is binding. But at any rate, the new law approved by the Senate means that the Supreme Court may well simply say that because Hamdan's habeus corpus petition was submitted before the new law was introduced in November 2005, his case is excluded from it and he is entitled to continue with federal court proceedings.

So, to get to the point, Bush is transparently, blatantly lying when he claims that the only thing stopping him from closing Guantanamo is a pending verdict from the Supreme Court - as if the case the Supreme Court is considering wasn't called Hamdan v Rumsfeld. As if his administration was merely confused about whether to hold military tribunals, and as if he couldn't simply order that the court be closed and that all detainees either be released or charged if he wanted to. As if the entire episode did not simply illustrate the administration's radical hostility to the law, its absolutely instrumentalist approach to it.

____________________________

Camp suicides 'hard to believe'

By Sally Nancarrow
BBC News

Omar Deghayes was arrested in Pakistan in 2002

The sister of a UK inmate of Guantanamo Bay has said she is "suspicious" about the suicides of three detainees at the US base in Cuba.

Amani Deghayes and her family have campaigned for the release of her brother Omar, 37, from Brighton, since his detention in 2002.

Ms Deghayes, from Kilburn, north London, said she did not know what to think about the suicides.

"I find it quite hard to believe they managed to kill themselves," she said.

Her suspicions have been raised, she explained, because inmates are allowed to have so few items in their cells.

'Act of warfare'

"It is really shocking. There is a lot of abuse in the camp. My brother lost an eye because of it," she said.

The camp commander Rear Admiral Harry Harris has said the two Saudis and a Yemeni killed themselves in "an act of asymmetric warfare" waged against the US.

The mens' bodies were found by camp guards on Saturday morning.

Mr Harris said they hanged themselves with clothing and bed sheets.

Amani Deghayes has campaigned for Foreign Office intervention

"If they did kill themselves, then it is understandable," said Ms Deghayes.

"It (Guantanamo) is such a closed institution and they are in such a horrible situation."

Mr Deghayes was arrested in Pakistan and accused of committing terrorist acts against the US, but his lawyers claim it was a case of mistaken identity.

Libyan-born Mr Deghayes, fled his homeland with the family in 1986 and was given asylum.

Last month the High Court in London ruled the Foreign Office had no obligation to put pressure on the US to release him, and two other British residents, because they did not have UK citizenship.

Ms Deghayes said as far as she knows her brother is in a different area of the camp to the highest security section where the inmates died.

"But the news I have of him is at least a year old - I have absolutely no idea where he is now," she said.



Go to Original Article >>>

The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.
Email: editor@lookingglassnews.org.

E-mail this Link   Printer Friendly




Untitled Document
Disclaimer
Donate | Fair Use Notice | Who We Are | Contact
Copyright 2005 Looking Glass News.