A former Wall Street Journal editor and a man credited with the success
of 'Reaganomics' has finally broken ranks and brought into question the unexplained
collapse of the twin towers and WTC building 7.
Former Assistant of the Treasury in the Reagan administration Paul Craig Roberts
questions why it is largely accepted that the Bush administration lied about
Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and yet many still believe they told the truth
Roberts' columns have been a consistent source of expert analysis and
no holds barred commentary but he is yet to go this far in addressing the real
culprits behind 9/11.
"Many patriotic readers have written to me expressing their frustration
that fact and common sense cannot gain a toehold in a debate guided by hysteria
and disinformation. Other readers write that 9/11 shields Bush from accountability,"
"They challenge me to explain why three World Trade Center buildings on
one day collapsed into their own footprints at free fall speed, an event outside
the laws of physics except under conditions of controlled demolition. They insist
that there is no stopping war and a police state as long as the government's
story on 9/11 remains unchallenged."
Roberts (pictured above) continues, "They could be right. There are not many
editors eager for writers to explore the glaring defects of the 9/11 Commission
Report. One would think that if the report could stand analysis, there would not
be a taboo against calling attention to the inadequacy of its explanations. We
know the government lied about Iraqi WMD, but we believe the government told the
truth about 9/11."
Roberts cites a press
release from '9/11 Scholars For Truth,' a group that comprises such credible
individuals as former German Defense Minister Andreas von Buelow and former
chief economist for the US Department of Labor under George W. Bush, Morgan
Reynolds. The press release lists the evidence suggesting 9/11 was carried out
with the complicity of the highest ranks of government and intelligence agencies.
Roberts is just the latest of a cacophony of credible individuals both in and
out of government to come forward and voice grave doubts about the official
story of 9/11.
In November, Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones challenged
the assumption that the twin towers and Building 7 collapsed from fire damage
"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings
and set off after the two plane crashes — which were actually a diversion
"Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings
after all," said Jones.