Bogus tape alert! The Bin Laden tape plugging Bill Blum's book Rogue State is a ridiculous neo-con forgery intended to tarnish the progressive left.
One thing that the Bush administration does well is manage perceptions of the
public. Amid protests over the NSA wiretapping, the extension of the Patriot
Act, and the nomination of neo-Fascist Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, an
audio tape on Osama Bin Laden is sent to Al Jazzera. On the tape, Bin Laden
suddenly veers from being a traditional right-wing Wahhabi fanatic to the right
of the House of Saud to a leftist progressive. The tape by Bin Laden was quickly
verified as "authentic" by a CIA that is now firmly in the grasp of
neo-cons under Porter Goss.
However, the tape is an obvious fake being used by the Bush administration
to scare Americans into believing "Al Qaeda" is making plans for another
attack and an attempt to link Bin Laden to Democrats.
The reason the tape is as phony as Niger yellowcake documents and Saddam's
weapons of mass destruction is as plain as day. "Bin Laden" allegedly
quotes from the introduction of a book written by long-time Washington, DC progressive
author and journalist and a friend of mine, Bill Blum. Bill was once an editor
and contributor to Covert Action Quarterly, a magazine devoted to exposing
CIA operations like the arming, funding, and training of Bin Laden and his mujaheddin
guerrillas during the Afghan-Soviet war.
The Bush perception managers are either incredibly stupid or are trying to
ensnare liberal journalists as aiders and abettors of Al Qaeda, something that
is certainly within their scope. Bin Laden allegedly quotes the following passage
from Blum's book, Rogue State: "If you (Americans) are sincere
in your desire for peace and security, we have answered you. And if Bush decides
to carry on with his lies and oppression, then it would be useful for you to
read the book Rogue State, which states in its introduction: 'If I
were president, I would stop the attacks on the United States: First I would
give an apology to all the widows and orphans and those who were tortured. Then
I would announce that American interference in the nations of the world has
ended once and for all.'" However, this quote is not from Rogue State,
again, pointing to a very bad forgery of the Bin Laden audiotape. No sooner
had the alleged Bin Laden tape been released, neo-con activist Cliff
Kincaid was already spinning nonsense about Blum and his publisher, Common
Courage Press of Monroe, Maine, being part of some sort of pro-Bin Laden progressive
and liberal "Fifth Columnist" grouping in the United States.
Bin Laden might not be so eager to quote Blum if he was aware of his other
work, Killing Hope, an expose of the CIA's covert wars. In it, Blum
defends to Soviet occupation of Afghanistan as self-defense against the CIA-backed
Islamist guerrillas, including Bin Laden's forces, that were backed by the CIA.
Now, why would Bin Laden plug an author like Blum who backed Bin Laden's hated
enemies, the Soviet Communists and their Afghan allies? Because the Bin Laden
tape and his purported oratory are frauds. In Killing Hope, this is
what Blum wrote about Bin Laden and his CIA masters' war in Afghanistan:
"The new government under President Taraki declared a commitment to
Islam within a secular state, and to non-alignment in foreign affairs. It
said the coup was not foreign inspired and that they were not Communists but
rather nationalists and revolutionaries. They pushed radical reforms, they
talked about class struggle, they used anti-imperialist rhetoric, they supported
Cuba, they signed a friendship treaty and other cooperative agreements with
the Soviets and they increased the number of Soviet civilian and military
advisers in Afghanistan.... In May 1979, British political scientist Fred
Halliday said 'probably more has changed in the countryside over the last
year than in the two centuries since the state was established.'
In March 1979, Afghan President Taraki visited Moscow to request Soviet help
to fight the mujahideen. The Soviets did promise some military aid, but they
would not commit ground troops. As Soviet Premier Alexei Kosygin told Taraki:
'The entry of our troops into Afghanistan would outrage the international
community, triggering a string of extremely negative consequences. Our common
enemies are just waiting for the moment when Soviet troops appear in Afghanistan.
This will give them the excuse they need to send armed bands into the country.'
. . . prior to the Soviet invasion, the CIA had been beaming radio propaganda
into Afghanistan and cultivating alliances with exiled Afghan guerrilla leaders
by donating medicine and communications equipment. U.S. foreign service officers
had been meeting with Mujahideen leaders to determine their needs at least
as early as April 1979. And, in July, President Carter had signed a 'finding'
to aid the rebels covertly, which led to the U.S. providing them with cash,
weapons, equipment and supplies, and engaging in propaganda and other psychological
operations in Afghanistan on their behalf."
So, we're now supposed to believe that Bin Laden has come around to
plug the book written by an author who demonstrated that the Soviet cause in
Afghanistan was for self-defense and in furtherance of the well-being of the
Afghan people and that Bin Laden's and his mujaheddin compatriots' cause was
anti-progressive and destabilizing to the central Asian region? This would be
laughable if it were not for the fact that the neo-cons are once again using
the Big Lie to further their ambitions of global domination and worldwide fascism.
The 911 attacks are beginning to look more and more like the Reichstag Fire,
both engineered to bring about fascist control.
Go to Original Article >>>
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not necessarily reflect those of Looking Glass News. Click the disclaimer link below for more information.