Untitled Document
US poor set to lose food stamps
Fairfax Digital
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/us-poor-set-to-lose-food-stamps/2005/10/29/1130400390006.html
With more than 38 million Americans too poor to buy adequate food,
the US Congress has begun to take away the food stamps many of them receive.
The Republican majority on the House Agriculture Committee has approved budget
cuts that will take "food stamps" away from an estimated 300,000 people
and could cut off school lunches and breakfasts for 40,000 children.
The action came as the US Government reported that the number of people who
are hungry because they can't afford to buy enough food rose to 38.2 million
in 2004, an increase of seven million in five years.
The number represents nearly 12 per cent of US households.
Food stamps are coupons distributed to low-income people and redeemable at
grocery stories for food.
The cuts, approved by the Republican-controlled committee on a party-line vote,
are part of an effort by Republicans to curb federal spending by $US50 billion
($65.7 billion).
The food and agriculture cuts would reduce spending by $US3.7 billion, including
$US844 million on nutrition, $US760 million on conservation and $US212 million
on payments to US farmers.
The $US574 million reduction in food stamp spending is estimated to shut up
to 300,000 people out of the program.
The restriction also could take free meals away from an estimated 40,000 school
children, because children in many states are automatically eligible for school
meals when they get food stamps, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The White House proposed the restriction earlier this year.
The bill would also raise the waiting period for food stamps for legal immigrants
from five to seven years.
Senate Republican leaders are seeking to curb spending by $US39 billion, and
have been more reluctant to cut government benefit programs.
The committee voted to shave $US212 million from direct payments to farmers,
a one per cent reduction over the next four years. Cuts to commodity programs
totalled $US1 billion and include repeal of a federal cotton subsidy to comply
with a World Trade Organisation ruling against the program.
____________________________________________________________________
House Panel OKs School Lunch Funding Cut
LIBBY QUAID, Associated Press Writer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051029/ap_on_go_co/food_farm_programs&printer
=1;_ylt=AuY2FR3.Co.1Gk9UQAP2Lu.MwfIE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-
The House Agriculture Committee approved budget cuts Friday that would
take food stamps away from an estimated 300,000 people and could cut off school
lunches and breakfasts for 40,000 children.
The action came as the government reported that the number of people who are
hungry because they can't afford to buy enough food rose to 38.2 million in
2004, an increase of 7 million in five years. The number represents nearly 12
percent of U.S. households.
"If there are cuts to be made, why should we make them on food stamps?"
said Rep. David Scott (news, bio, voting record), D-Ga. "This is the meanest
cut of all."
The cuts, approved by the Republican-controlled committee on a party-line vote,
are part of an effort by the House GOP to curb federal spending by $50 billion.
The food and agriculture cuts would reduce spending by $3.7 billion, including
$844 million on nutrition, $760 million on conservation and $212 million on
payments to farmers.
"The fact is, our country is going broke," said Rep. John Boehner
(news, bio, voting record), R-Ohio. "We're spending money we don't have
and passing it onto our kids, and at some point, somebody's got to say, `Enough's
enough.'"
The $574 million reduction in food stamp spending would affect families who
receive food stamps because they receive other non-cash government assistance.
The change is estimated to shut up to 300,000 people out of the program.
The restriction also could take free meals away from an estimated 40,000 school
children, because children in many states are automatically eligible for school
meals when they get food stamps, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The White House proposed the restriction earlier this year.
The bill would also raise the waiting period for food stamps for legal immigrants
from five to seven years.
Senate GOP leaders are seeking to curb spending by $39 billion, and have been
more reluctant to cut government benefit programs. The Senate Agriculture Committee
spared food stamps in approving a similar budget bill last week and voted for
greater reductions in farm payments and conservation.
The House committee voted to shave $212 million from direct payments to farmers,
a 1 percent reduction over the next four years. Cuts to commodity programs totaled
$1 billion and include repeal of a federal cotton subsidy to comply with a World
Trade Organization ruling against the program.
In a separate action Friday, the House voted 318-63 to approve the final version
of a $100 billion spending bill for food and farm programs for the budget year
that began Oct. 1. The Senate must approve the measure before it can go to President
Bush for his signature.
The bill delays until 2008 a meat labeling law that was to have gone into effect
last year. Pressure from meatpackers and supermarkets has blocked the labels,
which would tell shoppers what country their meat comes from.
The measure also overrides a court ruling on whether products with the round,
green "USDA Organic" seal can contain small amounts of non-organic
ingredients. An appeals court decided earlier this year that non-organic substances
— things like vitamins or baking powder — are not allowed in food
bearing the seal.
But more than 200 companies and trade groups said they can't make organic yogurt
and many other products without the ingredients in question, and congressional
negotiators agreed. An industry group, the Organic Trade Association, said the
ruling could cost manufacturers $758 million annually. Organic food has grown
rapidly, from a $1 billion industry in 1990 to an estimated $14.5 billion this
year.