Why is the topic of what really happened on 9/11/01 ever fresh?
It is now widely recognized that the justifications given by GWBush for America’s
war in Iraq were intentional frauds and thus war crimes,
The Iraq war would have been impossible to sell without the public blood rage
induced by the 911 attacks,
The specter of the FedGov attacking its own people as per Operation Northwoods
is increasingly the only explanation that lines up with the evidence and A May
22, 2006 Zogby poll shows that over 70 Million adult Americans support a new
investigation into 911 and believe that GWBush exploited the terrorist attack
to commence the Iraq war.
Among the propagandists continuing to hard sell the 911 “official
story” are ABC/CBS/NBS/FOX/PBS/ETC., talk radio, Hollywood and the major
print outlets. Their attacks on those proclaiming the truth about the FedGov
planning and/or allowing and/or executing the 911 attacks on the American people
A recent example of the MSM efforts to cover up the clear fabrications in the
911 “official story” was on 04/27/06 in USA Today, found here.
Consider the following excerpts in italics:
Called Loose Change, it is being downloaded from the Internet and shown
in small screenings here and overseas. It is not alone in the genre, and it
is not unusual in American history either to offer simplistic explanations
or demonize opponents. Presidents from Andrew Jackson to Lyndon Johnson were
accused by their contemporaries of massive government conspiracies.
(Watch the video Loose Change 2nd Edition http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewvideo.php?vid=loosechange2nde)
The Internet video in reference and notably not hyperlinked in the USA Today
piece is actually called Loose Change 911; watch it here. This video clearly
communicates numerous anomalies intentionally ignored by the “official
story” and is well worth watching. The USA Today commentators are trying
to use unsubstantiated innuendo to subdue the reader’s mind, take advantage
of the general reader’s lack of historical background and smear historical
With respect to LBJ it has been shown numerous times, even as recently as 2002
with the release of tapes from his library in Austin, that he knew the Gulf
of Tonkin incident to be a falsehood. LBJ used that fabrication as false pretext
for continuing the war in SE Asia.
The film appears especially popular among young people immersed in a
Web culture brimming with sites that question the credibility of government.
They see 9/11 as the defining moment of their lives. ”This is our generation's
Vietnam, our generation's Kennedy assassination," says Korey Rowe, 23,
the film's producer.
The justifications for the Iraq War have been shown to be completely fraudulent.
Just ask 27-year CIA veteran Ray McGovern or former CIA Middle East analyst
who specialized in counter-terrorism, Paul Pillar. Why was it El Pais, a major
newspaper from Madrid, Spain, that did the Pillar interview on such as hot topic
and not USA Today?
Is there really an overarching parallel between JFK-Vietnam and 911-Iraq? Without
the silencing of JFK could the Vietnam War have been escalated? Without the
911 induced blood rage of the American Mind could the Iraq War have been launched?
Back in 1963 the publicly induced and “planted” presupposition,
there could only be one shooter – Oswald, stood against the actual facts.
Accordingly, the impossible physics of the Magic Bullet Theory – courtesy
of then young attorney and now Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter – had
to become the official story. Anybody that still believes the JFK “official
story”, aka the Warren Commission, is a compliant sponge.
As was then, so is now.
The publicly induced and “planted” presupposition, it had to be
foreign terrorists who hijacked the planes, is easier for many to stomach than
the actual treasonous reality. Those who continue to believe the impossible
FedGov official story - 19 Arabs with box cutters who can fly better than Top
Gun instructors, nonexistent airplane debris at the Pentagon, steel skyscrapers
collapsing due to smoldering fires, complete failure of NORAD, no put option
manipulation, etc. – have put their brains on a shelf.
Lyndon Johnson’s fraudulent continuation of the Vietnam War renders him
as a mass murderer of American Soldiers and local citizens. The same ugly truth
rests on the war criminal GWBush for his fraudulent commencement of the war
If the FedGov and its Ministry of Newspeak, the Main Stream Media, ever loses
control of the 911 “official story” and the national mind, it will
be life threatening to the soulless elites who are behind this mess. That so
many still do believe in the “official story” fully demonstrates
the raw power of psychological brainwashing.
Additional excerpts …
Professors and researchers of film and politics say the Internet is making
it far easier to spread such theories because the traditional media are losing
their hold on the news.
A free news space is a very good thing for freedom and a disaster for those
seeking to control not inform. If the Internet is wrong then let the foolishness
of these conspiracy arguments suffer examination. For starters, let’s
have the FedGov release all the Pentagon surveillance tapes and those tapes
immediately confiscated from the security cameras of local area businesses.
It is the 911 “official story” that is being shielded at all costs
from examination and scrutiny.
The immense coverage of controversies and accusations surrounding the
war on terror has created fertile ground for people who assign their own interpretations
to photos, footage, eyewitnesses, investigations and newspaper accounts of
what happened, they say.
Who decreed the USA Today as the assigner of truth? Is the reader only to consume
and not consider? Orwell would be howling at the current mess.
"The information revolution now gives us access to too much information,"
says Jonathan Taplin, who teaches at the Annenberg School for Communications
at the University of Southern California.
Who elected Mr. Taplin to determine what is or is not too much information?
It was primarily the pesky Internet Writers who kept alive the truth about non-existent
Iraqi WMD lies in the larger conversation, a responsibility that the NYT, Washington
Post and the Major Media completely failed.
"Our problems are that we're just overwhelmed, so in some sense
we just basically don't even know where to turn."
So if this professor at USC "doesn't know where to turn" why should
he even suggest a limit on information? That he is confused and overwhelmed
does not mean that others are.
What many of the Internet Writers have and major media pukes uniformly do not
is the ability to think and synthesize many facts. Americans are no longer taught
to think, especially in a larger picture where seemingly disparate facts can
be integrated. This political-technological age worships specialization with
independent thinking needing to be squashed.
Most of what the film (Loose Change911) alleges is refuted by the evidence
This statement by USA Today is pure crap. The evidence in Loose Change 911,
other videos, books and web sites has been ignored, unreported or denigrated
without foundation at virtually every turn. If the FedGov wants the 911 Truth
Movement to go away, then for starters turn over all the surveillance tapes
from the Pentagon and let the people see what really happened.
Anything not answered definitively by the government is interpreted by
the film as proof of a cover up.
In a criminal investigation what is ignored or is refused to answer are valid
or even critical lines of inquiry. This excerpt attempts to deed unassailable
truth and sole authority to the FedGov sources. Is that a rational course of
The leadership of the FedGov guaranteed the American people that Iraq had WMD.
Those statements of certainty have been proven to be intentional frauds. As
a default assumption, whatever the FedGov tells you must be consciously disbelieved.
Among the assertions in Loose Change is that a missile hit the Pentagon
even though eyewitnesses saw the jet, numerous pieces of wreckage were found
including the flight recorder, and those on the flight and in its path at
the Pentagon are dead.
The USA Today article uses the term “eyewitness” without any qualification
implying uniform agreement among Pentagon witnesses that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
That is not only incorrect but also clearly deceptive.
Yes, many witnesses have stated that they saw a jet airliner but not all. Some
eyewitnesses stated that it was not a large jet airliner but some other type
Ken Ford: One eyewitness, State Department employee Ken Ford, said he watched
from the 15th floor of the State Department Annex, just across the Potomac River
from the Pentagon. We were watching the airport through binoculars, Ford said,
referring to Reagan National Airport, a short distance away. The plane was a
two-engine turbo prop that flew up the river from National. Then it turned back
toward the Pentagon. We thought it had been waved off and then it hit the building.
Jose Velasquez: "It was like an earthquake", "By the time I got
outside all I could see was a giant cloud of smoke, first white then black,
coming from the Pentagon," he said. Velasquez says the gas station's security
cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact.
"I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The
FBI was here within minutes and took the film."
Don Wright from the 12th floor, 1600 Wilson Boulevard, in Rosslyn: " ..
I watched this ...it looked like a commuter plane, two engined ... come down
from the south real low ... "
A similar assertion, that the “Whole Country” saw a 757 hit the
Pentagon, was made on April 19, 2006 by San Francisco Chronicle reporter Cinnamon
Stillwell. Certain Internet Writers immediately exposed this claim as bogus,
and the paper issued a retraction the next day removing all references to people
seeing a 757 hit the Pentagon. For the honest minded, the existence of major
factual discrepancies in the eyewitness accounts should force one to consider
the physical evidence at the point of impact and the debris field.
The smallness of the impact hole, the absence of debris consistent with an
airliner crash and many other anomalies at the Pentagon site require ones to
conclude it was not a 757. Even though it is uncertain what exactly did hit
the Pentagon, it is only necessary to show that it was not a 757. At that point,
the validity of the official story at the Pentagon has been emptied and must
be recognized as another monstrous deception.
The USA Today piece continues with commentary about the World Trade Center
There is also the claim that because jet fuel burns at up to 1,500 degrees
and steel melts at 2,750 degrees, the World Trade Center's infrastructure
could not have been brought down by the airliners. However, as reported by
the Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, steel loses 50%
of its strength at 1,200 degrees, enough for a failure.
Yes jet fuel burns at optimal conditions at about 1500 degrees F. But the flame
color and smoke at the Twin Towers clearly point to a less than optimal fire,
a lack of oxygen and lack of additional fuel to reach that ideal temperature.
Furthermore, the Twin Towers were designed with a Factor of Safety of at least
6-8 times greater than the estimated worst-case load. Even if 1500 degrees F
had been reached, there was more than adequate structural strength in the steel
superstructure for the Twin Towers to stand. The USA Today mentions nothing
about the Windsor Building Fire in Madrid, Spain being fully engulfed on February
11, 2005 and yet did not fall. Nor does it say anything about the recorded voices
of the NYFD people stating that the World Trade Center fires were quite capable
of being controlled and put out.
USA Today closes its hit piece with the following:
Conservative writer David Horowitz, a former 1960s radical, says conspiratorial
thinking can offer a worldview that is somehow less scary than reality. "Conspiracy
theories are a kind of secular religion," he says, adding that campus
faculties sometimes encourage anti-government feelings. "People feel
great anxiety ... by the thought that nobody's in control."
Wrong. The American People should be scared and anxious when they realize that
the FedGov leadership in all likelihood murdered American citizens as an emotional
pretext to war. Ohhhh Mr. Horowitz, can you say “Pentagon Papers”
- Gulf of Tonkin and “Body of Secrets” - Operation Northwoods? Hmmm
… maybe Neocon David is occupying a different altered state of unconsciousness
People believe in conspiracy theories because the truth "is either
too simple or too remote," says sociologist Clifton Bryant of Virginia
Tech University, who has made a study of "deviant logic" and behavior.
"We're always ready to believe something about which we know nothing,"
Wrong again. With an open-minded examination of the facts, the official story
about 911 is too phantasmagorical to be swallowed. USA Today’s inclusion
of this sociologist’s area of study, “deviant logic”, implies
that those who do not believe the official view are “deviant”. If
not, then why was this reference mentioned?
Freedom of speech and freedom of thought mean zilch to USA Today. Without the
Freedom of Information Act exercised by James Bamford in “Body of Secrets”,
we would know nothing of the Joint Chiefs of Staff planning a murderous attack
in the 1960’s on American citizens and American cities as a false pretext
for war with Cuba, aka Operation Northwoods. Is it sheer coincidence that JFK
was assassinated soon after rejecting this naked treason submitted by the military
leadership at the Pentagon?
The USA Today author (William M. Welch), his contributors (Oren Dorell and
Kasie Hunt), David Horowitz, Clifton Bryant and others are but tools of the
enemies of truth and America. Those enemies of the Constitution and individual
freedom are attempting to herd the people over the cliff and into the abyss
of Fascism. It is neither “deviant logic” nor “empty mindedness”
to believe that the FedGov treasonously attacked its own people on 911. Some
of us still have working minds, are awake to the treachery of 911 and will not
go easily or without any challenge.
11 Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even
12 for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them
13 But all things become visible when they are exposed by the light, for everything
that becomes visible is light.