In Bushzarro world, as we know, up is down, right is left, and violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and international law is legal and within Bush’s reading on the Constitution. In fact, under the NPT, Iran has the right to develop peaceful nuclear technology, although of course the neocons argue Iran is feverishly building nuclear weapons, an assertion made without any credible evidence (essentially a re-run of the weapons of mass destruction argument—lies and fabrications—made in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq). It is interesting to note that the very development of the B61-11 is a violation of the NPT, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, and international law dating back to the Clinton administration, thus once again illustrating the fact the neocons don’t have a monopoly on criminal renegade behavior.

“A central and expressed purpose of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) has always been to arrest the further evolution of the world’s nuclear arsenals,” noted the Los Alamos Study Group on February 10, 1997, during the Clinton administration. “This modified weapon—certified without nuclear testing and deployed after signing the CTBT—undercuts that treaty and could provide political cover to countries which have their own unsatisfied nuclear ambitions.”

So-called “earth-penetrating weapons” (more accurately described as weapons that release radiation into the earth and atmosphere) were “rejected for deployment by Presidents Carter, Reagan, and Bush,” thus demonstrating there was at least a modicum of sanity—at least in regard to nuclear weapons—before Bubba and Bush Minor and his coven of Straussian neocons came on the scene.

“What is known about the B61-11 strongly suggests that its rushed development has been motivated by a desire to target one or more non-nuclear-weapon states.” Iran is such a non-nuclear state. “Hersh says that within the Bush administration, there are concerns that even a pummelling by conventional strikes, may not sufficiently damage Iran’s buried nuclear plants,” reports the Independent. Naturally, the neocons realize there are no such “buried nuclear plants” and the purpose is simply to inflict on the Iranian people the sort of damage Bush and crew inflicted on Iraq’s population of 24 million people (minus around 250,000 killed by the Straussian Mafia).

Clinton’s Pentagon told a big lie about developing the B61-11 (and who knows what other secrecy-shrouded weapon systems) in “order to gain support for indefinite extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).” In April and May of 1995, the United States “repeatedly assured the world … that it would not continue ‘vertical proliferation.’ Yet during these same months the Department of Energy (DOE) was seeking, and obtaining, approval for a weapon modification with significant new military utility.” In order to keep the development secret, “this weapon was approved outside the regular budget process and without congressional debate, by means of secret letters to key committee chairmen, raising constitutional questions.” Clinton—who is a more convincing liar than Bush—”and nuclear weapons laboratory spokespersons … assured a skeptical public that no new nuclear weapons would be developed or built. At the very same time, secret development of this provocative weapon was being requested by the Department of Defense (DoD) and carried out by the DOE in complete secrecy.”

As critics claimed before “everything changed” (or was changed by the neocons), “adding low-yield warheads to the world’s nuclear inventory simply makes their eventual use more likely,” according to Dr. Robert W. Nelson of the Federation of American Scientists. “Furthermore, a 1994 law currently prohibits the nuclear laboratories from undertaking research and development that could lead to a precision nuclear weapon of less than 5 kilotons (kt), because ‘low-yield nuclear weapons blur the distinction between nuclear and conventional war,”" a blurring effect well under way within the Bush administration and over at the Council on Foreign Relations (see “The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy” by Keir A. Lieber and Daryl G. Press, an article actually arguing nukes should be used).

It is now obvious the criminal globalist elite plan to use nukes and believe they can contain this once unimaginable usage to the “third world” where “rogue regimes” with or without nukes or weapons of mass destruction need to be dealt with in severe fashion—that is to say they must be irradiated and suffer horrible deaths.

“In addition to the immediate effects of blast, air shock, and thermal radiation, shallow nuclear explosions produce especially intense local radioactive fallout,” explains Nelson of FAS. “The fireball breaks through the surface of the earth, carrying into the air large amounts of dirt and debris. This material has been exposed to the intense neutron flux from the nuclear detonation, which adds to the radioactivity from the fission products. The cloud typically consists of a narrow column and a broad base surge of air filled with radioactive dust which expands to a radius of over a mile for a 5 kiloton explosion.”

Imagine such “intense local radioactive fallout” in Tehran, population approximately 12 million.

Obviously, if Bush indeed nukes Iran, as we are now told, we are dealing with a war criminal of Hitlerian proportions. Since it appears Bush and the neocon maniacs will be allowed to proceed and nuke Iran (and other countries on the neocon hit list), we can only hope in the catastrophic wake they will be rounded up and prosecuted. Fat chance of this happening before Bush and crew begin slinging nukes around.

Most American know little or nothing about Bush’s desire to nuke Iran. Ignorance is bliss—until you wake up one morning and there are funny looking sunrises in the east, west, north, and south.

For far too many Americans, B61-11 might as well be tonight’s lottery number.